I've adopted a New Years' sort-of resolution. I've come to the realization lately that I really like to write, and it seems I'm kind of good at it (note my correct usage of parentheses here; my English teachers' time was not wasted). So I've resolved to write at least once piece a week for my blog, which has been sadly unused for the better part of a decade. Be warned: I tend to write kind of long, but fortunately, the Internet doesn't charge per word, at least not yet. Plus, it's my blog, and I'll blather if I want to, with apologies to Lesley Gore.
You see, I've been bereft of ideas for some time now--call it terminal writer's block. I've had some really tragic thing happen in the past year (one of which I'll go into shortly), and it put me in a strange, sad, disconnected place for a while there. But recently, I've begun blowing the dust off some old projects, and starting some new ones, so the writer's disease appears to be heading toward remission. I feel in some strange way that I need to do my part to push the process along. But there's the rub--how do you break writer's block, and actually do some writing when you have nothing to write about because you have writer's block?
I mulled this over and found a solution that might solve two things at one time. To explain, I'll jump back almost a year, to when my mother, Elaine, passed away from an evil combination of heart valve failure and stroke. Knowing that she was not really a fan of organized religion, but recognizing that funerals really aren't for the dead (they're held so the rest of us that are still stuck in this plane of existence can have the closure of comforting ritual), I decided that the only thing I could really do would be to perform her ceremony myself. For the record, officiating a funeral--for anyone, not to mention someone you cared about very deeply--turned out to be much more overwhelming than I ever thought it could be, and I would not recommend it to anyone. Ever. I can't say it was a mistake, though, for in the end, I finally realized that I did it only partly out of necessity. The more I examined myself, the more I discovered that I had chosen to do something so monumentally difficult just to keep myself busy, to hold off on experiencing my own grief for as long as was possible. Bear in mind that I genuinely feel that I honored her beliefs by performing the ceremony, but I didn't realize how much of it I was doing for myself until later. I found out I really, really don't like grief, but I guess nobody does.
And there's another thing that needs to at least be mentioned here: My old "buddy" Death came calling again, almost exactly three months later. This time, he came for Elaine's mother, Lola (perhaps better known as simply "Granny"); her daughter's funeral would be the last one she would attend before her own. I won't go into that at the moment, as this is Elaine's entry, but I'll write more about it in my next posts--it was at least equally devastating to me, if not even more so after losing my mother, and deserves more than a mere mention.
But for now, back to Elaine's funeral. It turned out fairly well, in spite of a late start, and in spite of the fact that I hadn't completed the eulogy portion until the day of the event, right before I spoke the words. Looking back, I now know that I couldn't bring myself to dig deep enough to figure out what I wanted to say. I had avoided my grief completely until the eulogy was delivered. I'm even having some trouble writing about this now... the best way I can explain it is that it feels like my grief is water in a balloon, memories of Elaine and Granny bonded together like molecules of H2O. Scratch just a hair too deep, push just a touch too hard, and whoosh--down the rabbit hole I go, ne'er to return.
So for now, the balloon remains intact. I'll deal with this in my own time, as we all must. I'll write more about this later. It feels kind of good to talk about this, whether anybody's listening or not.
Now, back to the part about taking care of two things at once. I spoke of the first one--to make a blog post every week. Well, the eulogy was written some time ago, and I liked what I came up with (considering as haphazard as it feels to me), so it made sense to use that as one of the pieces. First problem solved. The second thing is responding to the handful of folks who had wanted a copy of my remarks at the funeral. Some people really seemed to like it, and I made vague promises of sending it out, but can't really remember who I talked to after delivering the piece (or much else for that matter), so I never have. Publishing the comments I delivered at Elaine's funeral addresses both of these things. And as everyone knows, I'm all about efficiency (well, maybe at work, at least. Not so much in my personal life; it's kind of cluttered and messy).
So I guess that's it for now. I'm working the prayer and eulogy into a second post right after this one. Then, in the next few days, I'll do the same for Granny's eulogy. Feel free to comment or send me an email if you like. And as a closing thought: I can't remember if I adequately expressed my gratefulness for those who came. It really meant a lot to me to see so many people drive out to Okay, Oklahoma to say goodbye. And I know Elaine would have thought it was pretty great as well.
You see, I've been bereft of ideas for some time now--call it terminal writer's block. I've had some really tragic thing happen in the past year (one of which I'll go into shortly), and it put me in a strange, sad, disconnected place for a while there. But recently, I've begun blowing the dust off some old projects, and starting some new ones, so the writer's disease appears to be heading toward remission. I feel in some strange way that I need to do my part to push the process along. But there's the rub--how do you break writer's block, and actually do some writing when you have nothing to write about because you have writer's block?
I mulled this over and found a solution that might solve two things at one time. To explain, I'll jump back almost a year, to when my mother, Elaine, passed away from an evil combination of heart valve failure and stroke. Knowing that she was not really a fan of organized religion, but recognizing that funerals really aren't for the dead (they're held so the rest of us that are still stuck in this plane of existence can have the closure of comforting ritual), I decided that the only thing I could really do would be to perform her ceremony myself. For the record, officiating a funeral--for anyone, not to mention someone you cared about very deeply--turned out to be much more overwhelming than I ever thought it could be, and I would not recommend it to anyone. Ever. I can't say it was a mistake, though, for in the end, I finally realized that I did it only partly out of necessity. The more I examined myself, the more I discovered that I had chosen to do something so monumentally difficult just to keep myself busy, to hold off on experiencing my own grief for as long as was possible. Bear in mind that I genuinely feel that I honored her beliefs by performing the ceremony, but I didn't realize how much of it I was doing for myself until later. I found out I really, really don't like grief, but I guess nobody does.
And there's another thing that needs to at least be mentioned here: My old "buddy" Death came calling again, almost exactly three months later. This time, he came for Elaine's mother, Lola (perhaps better known as simply "Granny"); her daughter's funeral would be the last one she would attend before her own. I won't go into that at the moment, as this is Elaine's entry, but I'll write more about it in my next posts--it was at least equally devastating to me, if not even more so after losing my mother, and deserves more than a mere mention.
But for now, back to Elaine's funeral. It turned out fairly well, in spite of a late start, and in spite of the fact that I hadn't completed the eulogy portion until the day of the event, right before I spoke the words. Looking back, I now know that I couldn't bring myself to dig deep enough to figure out what I wanted to say. I had avoided my grief completely until the eulogy was delivered. I'm even having some trouble writing about this now... the best way I can explain it is that it feels like my grief is water in a balloon, memories of Elaine and Granny bonded together like molecules of H2O. Scratch just a hair too deep, push just a touch too hard, and whoosh--down the rabbit hole I go, ne'er to return.
So for now, the balloon remains intact. I'll deal with this in my own time, as we all must. I'll write more about this later. It feels kind of good to talk about this, whether anybody's listening or not.
Now, back to the part about taking care of two things at once. I spoke of the first one--to make a blog post every week. Well, the eulogy was written some time ago, and I liked what I came up with (considering as haphazard as it feels to me), so it made sense to use that as one of the pieces. First problem solved. The second thing is responding to the handful of folks who had wanted a copy of my remarks at the funeral. Some people really seemed to like it, and I made vague promises of sending it out, but can't really remember who I talked to after delivering the piece (or much else for that matter), so I never have. Publishing the comments I delivered at Elaine's funeral addresses both of these things. And as everyone knows, I'm all about efficiency (well, maybe at work, at least. Not so much in my personal life; it's kind of cluttered and messy).
So I guess that's it for now. I'm working the prayer and eulogy into a second post right after this one. Then, in the next few days, I'll do the same for Granny's eulogy. Feel free to comment or send me an email if you like. And as a closing thought: I can't remember if I adequately expressed my gratefulness for those who came. It really meant a lot to me to see so many people drive out to Okay, Oklahoma to say goodbye. And I know Elaine would have thought it was pretty great as well.